Law Enforcement and Patron
Privacy
An Educational Service of
the American Library Association
Office for Information
Technology Policy
Prepared by Leslie Harris
& Associates - www.lharris.com
in conjunction with OITP
staff - www.ala.org/oitp
------------------------------------------------------
Over the past few years, the
public and the library community have become concerned by the escalation of
visits to libraries from a variety of law enforcement agents, including FBI
agents and officers of state, county, and municipal police departments. Law enforcement officers are seemingly
turning to libraries more often to investigate computer crimes such as e-mail
threats, child pornography, and other online obscenity violations. Additionally, the events of September 11,
2001, and the subsequent passage of the USA Patriot Act have contributed to the
increase in law enforcement activities in the library.
As mentioned in prior
tutorials, the laws protecting national security interests and authorizing
state and federal criminal investigations supersede a librarian's ethical
obligation to protect patron privacy rights and state library confidentiality laws. Consequently, librarians should understand
what specific circumstances give rise to a legal obligation to disclose patron
records to law enforcement agents, and what to do in those situations. Libraries should establish procedures for
handling law enforcement requests, and train all library staff, including volunteers,
on the library's procedures.
In general, libraries are
only obligated to disclose patron records to law enforcement agents if directed
by a court order. A court order may be
in the form of a subpoena, which commands the production of specified evidence
in a person's possession within a stated period of time, or a search warrant,
which authorizes law enforcement officers to conduct a search of a place and
seize evidence. Library counsel should
examine all subpoenas for any legal defect, including the manner in which it
was served on the library, the breadth of its request, its form, or an
insufficient showing of good cause made to a court. If a defect exists, library counsel may advise the library to
file a motion to quash the subpoena or a motion for a protective order. A motion to quash a subpoena is used to
nullify or terminate the subpoena, while a motion for a protective order is
used to limit the scope of the subpoena or relieve the library from complying with
certain terms of the subpoena. Unlike a
subpoena, a search warrant is executable immediately, and a law enforcement
agent may begin a search of library records or facilities as soon as the
library director or officer is served with the court's order. Without a court order, neither the FBI nor
local law enforcement agents have the authority to compel a librarian to
cooperate with an investigation or answer questions.
Some search warrants are
issued by a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court, which are
special courts aimed at regulating the collection of "foreign
intelligence" information in furtherance of U.S. counterintelligence. These warrants may not be challenged in
court. If a search warrant is issued by
a FISA court, the search warrant also contains a "gag order." That means that no one affiliated with the
library may disclose that the warrant has been served, or that records have
been produced in connection with the warrant, even to the patron. FISA and the USA Patriot Act will be
discussed in greater detail in the following tutorial.
-----------------------------------------------------
Further information:
USA Patriot Act in the
Library:
http://www.ala.org/alaorg/oif/usapatriotlibrary.html
American Library Association
Code of Ethics:
http://www.ala.org/alaorg/oif/ethics.html
-----------------------------------------------------
Copyright 2002, American
Library Association, Office for
Information Technology
Policy
Disclaimer
This Online Privacy Tutorial
is a service of the American Library Association. The content of this tutorial
is primarily the work of Leslie Harris & Associates in Washington, DC. The
views expressed in these messages are not necessarily the views of ALA or
Leslie Harris & Associates. This tutorial is for information only and will
not necessarily provide answers to concerns that arise in any particular
situation. This service is not legal advice and does not include many of the
technical details arising under certain laws. If you are seeking legal advice
to address specific privacy issues, you should consult an attorney licensed to
practice in your state.